InvestorsHub Logo

GCRox99

06/02/06 7:49 AM

#41699 RE: stingray2 #41697

stingray2:
Once again you are stating:
Sunncomm does not hold the majority a stake in MMXT.
The last time you posted that statement I repied to your post with the following.


Posted by: GCRox99
In reply to: stingray2 who wrote msg# 41463 Date:5/21/2006 2:31:28 PM
Post #of 41695

Stingray2:
You said:
Kenco, The majority shares are not controlled by Sunncomm. That is why your assertians are bogus.

So are we to assume that they lied in the most recent SEC filing?

From the filing:
The following chart sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by (i) each person who, as of May 10, 2006, was known by us to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of our Common Stock, and (ii) our officers and directors and (iii) officers and directors as a group.


NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1) Percent of Class
SunnComm Technologies, Inc.
668 N. 44th Street, Suite 248
Phoenix, AZ. 85008 38,068,853 19.79

JTM Investments I, L.P.
John T. Mills, General Partner
2213 Midvale Terrace
Henderson, NV. 89074 10,195,476 5.30


Now either MMXT lied in the recent def 14 filings with the SEC or you are posting false and misleading information! Please post the link to your assertion that Sunncomm does not hold the majority stake in MMXT as you posted this as fact not an opinion. It certainly calls into question the validity of the vote that was cited in the filing!

Also, you post the following as FACT:
As for the statement in the 14c about the need to complete the merger.The facts are that KC and Granite opposed the merger. They we wanted to enhance their value and from combining the shares and leave the the Sunncomm holding the bag.
Kevin raised no funds, sold no product and shared little if any information. He spent little time in Phoenix. It was beyond his grasp.

I'm sure as a Asst Moderator of this board you have a LINK to back up these statements you made about Kevin Clement. These derogatory statements you are now making about Clement certainly fly in the face of statements made by TDJ who recently visited with him in Phoenix, Danny who visited with him a couple of months ago and with your own four months of posts pumping Clement as a "go getter", "get er done guy" etc.






corey

06/02/06 9:54 AM

#41710 RE: stingray2 #41697

Hey stinger, you can beg to differ as much as you'd like.I never stated sunncomm holds the majority stake in mmxt.Have you had your coffee yet this morning?My statement had nothing to do with KC. Don't twist my words!! I simply stated peter controls both companies and he does!! He has been calling the shots for both of them from the beggining.And will continue to do so after this KC mess is in the garbage can!!!

Those 38 million shares IMO opinion are what's left of our dividend and may or may not be a majority stake by percentage owned.You might be thinking majority voting power which would be 51%