Replies to post #60274 on Bots Inc (BTZI)

[New-Old-School]

Could these "secret" record ordering customers/distributors for mcig cafs and vtcq be each other?

Makes a compelling case to have one and the same CFO, and one and the same auditors, for CAFS, Mcig, and Vitacig. It may turn out to be a 10Q circle fest of deferred revenues between these three amigos.

Most companies are more than happy to share the name, and some details, of their legitimate distributor agreements. I think they really need to be a little less vague going forward. All we can do is speculate wildly, details shouldn't be a bad thing to share. Reminds me of the "famous hospitality" group PR that "could not be disclosed at this time", and seems to have been vaporized at some point, since way back when.

Also, I wonder if CAFS will ever make it to "reporting" like they told mCig they would.
Many questions that hopefully, Mr. 10Q will answer.

[BubbaInSC]

Simple, because MCIG products are NOT in 1000's of stores.

[lesgetrich]

they released cafe serenpedity

it would be in the interest of investors if they said what 1000 stores they were in, why wouldn't they release that?

They have an exclusive agreement with Cafe Serendipity. MCIG is their primary supplier by contract and they will be exchanging stock and board members. They would not necessarily have exclusive agreements with a national distributor and it could give a competitor a blueprint for marketing competing products. Once the stores have their products, they can list the locations without revealing details of the distributor or their contract arrangements.