InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Protector

05/19/15 7:21 AM

#219787 RE: ku #219770

ku, just for the record.

It is not because I don't play that I do not appreciate Loof effort to organize this PPHM PPS prediction speculation poll. I don't mind some more colour on the PPHM board. That is why I have send a reformatted presentation of it to Loof.

The reason why I don't play is because I know one thing for SURE (and with SURE I mean 100% SURE and no space for any doubt) and that is that the PPHM PPS will NOT *** NOT *** behave in the ways one could derive by analogy with other stock and comparable situations (such as early stops or PIII approvals or priority reviews or large contracts, etc).

PPHM only need ONE trigger and what follows then will be never seen. And as this trigger could be there tomorrow or in 2 years from know, I will not speculate on the PPS because it is TOTALLY UNPREDICTABLE in time till thtat trigger happens, and who know what it will be. It may well be an event that we have NEVER EVER mentioned yet.