Replies to post #3317 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Neenny]

So Matt,
Who is the "mystery shopper??"

[Neenny]

Still waiting on your reply to my last question. But I have another question also...

Can you explain this...(and keep your integrity intact??)

Matt,

I find it interesting that you use the term "mystery shopper" in your clarification. Anthony posted this morning that...the "story" about the mystery shopper was completely for the purpose of discussing "mystery shoppers" He even titled his post, "Just a Story
He ended that post with this, Please do not misinterpret or extrapolate anything other than a story to discuss, if these practice are appropriate.

I am just curious to find out!

It is rather amazing how his "Just a Story" sounds strangely like the scenario you just described.

Why is that??

<btw, thinking about your educational backround>

[JXM]

Why would you even ponder using a company which is (or was to be) an affiliate of iHub as your mystery shopping site?

Why would you allow your credibility to be compromised in this manner? This makes no sense to me whatsoever.

At least we know why it took a couple of days for Anthony to answer. Took that long to put together the spin story.

And tell me that Anthony was planning to come clean about Kurious Kat after I posted the info tying him to the "mrdoc" alias. Go back and read his response, he was done, his explanation was out there. Except for that one little slip where he said "aliases".

And explain this Matt, after the mystery shopping spree was over, why didn't you reinstate all of stockaholic's posts that Kurious Kat deleted? If it was only a test, or if he was doing a bad job as a CoB as you said on the "affiliates" thread, why didn't you reinstate the deleted messages once the test was over?

JXM