InvestorsHub Logo

sweep5

05/06/15 6:14 PM

#25412 RE: SULAX #25411

Though I have often been at odds with some of my fellow posters I think this is a valid question. Is it just too expensive, or too late? Or not worth the trouble? Someone in the Gleasman family needs to answer for the lies told. I still have some hope for the future but that doesn't erase the past.

Leitrim

05/07/15 12:06 PM

#25414 RE: SULAX #25411

That was my only bone
of contention with Ole Jim- just cause
he believed certain things didn't mean it
was a fair and accurate representation of where things stood.
And the BOD, Counsel sat and watched him pitch
fairy tales.Over and done- but if properly informed which was
our right as shareholders- maybe we could have bailed on this
before everything evaporated as nothing came to fruition.
criminal ? probably not- bad business- For sure.