Why is it that people who like to tout a stock always turn things around. It's the company that needs to prove their claims. They are the ones putting out the PR's. Not one PR has stated what revenues actually are only what they project as possibilities. The company is the one who has flooded the market by issuing shares into these PR's. The company is the one who has raised the Authorized share structure after issuing all they could of the outstanding shares and the company is the one who won't answer share holder concerns other than lame attempts to say their will be no reverse split and then issuing more share that further dilute the stcok as a stock dividend in order to attempt to draw more investors.
So what part of my post isn't true? Can you tell me just 1 (one) concrete thing that the company has provided? Other than stating company policy is no Reverse Splits. You ask us all to prove what is happening. Why don't you prove that the company is on the up and up and that their projections are factual.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
