Replies to post #107215 on Marani Brands Inc. (MRIB)

[specutator]

In order to prove tortious interference versus defamation or slander, MRIB would also have to prove economic advantage as motive which is what separates the two offenses.

Not the case at all! The difficult part would be a tortious interference claim. The "defamation or slander" claim would be a piece of cake. The former would be on Marani to prove, the latter would be on a defendant to prove.

A person/company like Marani cannot be called a "thief" without prior proof of a crime and hoping a discover process will provide that proof would be useless as there are limits built into the discovery process.