InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

m0town12

04/30/15 10:17 AM

#183356 RE: GDorn #183355

Would that mean llamas would hand his ownership over?
icon url

Art Vandeley

04/30/15 10:25 AM

#183359 RE: GDorn #183355

Here is an interesting thought...Weren't the two plaintiffs supposedly staying on as directors during the transition to oversee the transition and that the assets were transferred? Why didn't they sue then and allow HDDC to receive the shares whithout completing their end of the deal? Did they just incriminate themselves for breach of fiduciary duty?
icon url

Art Vandeley

04/30/15 10:27 AM

#183360 RE: GDorn #183355

Even if hddc gives back 200 million shares, titus still will have majority ownweship....