I don't think anyone has claimed that dilution is happening currently, I think the conversation is more geared towards the inevitability of forward-looking dilution. That in my opinion is a very valid and transparent conversation to have. He's basically saying, don't be married to BCCI in the long run. That's what I deduct from his posts.
As for this stock, all I need to look at is this:
Bottom seen in December and steady accumulation since then. There is a reason why there almost always seems to be more volume on the bid than the ask these days. NO ONE IS LEGITIMATELY SELLING RIGHT NOW because BCCI is like a horse waiting for the starting gate to open. When that happens is anyone's guess but there are a lot of people sitting with their tickets in the grandstands right now. Those that have to piss aren't even getting up to go to the bathrooms right now.
The truth of the matter is this accumulation is much more organic than a blockbuster news release with a huge spike in volume, the volume which will eventually come at this rate anyhow. I would honestly rather see this thing edge slowly towards 5-6 cents without a spike. Parabolic returns are much better than returns as the by-product of pumping.
For management the real question should be: How do we "stay" under the radar for as long as possible? That I believe is reason behind the switch in PR. It seems contradictory but in truth it is quite brilliant.