Replies to post #54064 on Revolutionary Concepts Inc (fka REVO)

[360spyder1]

REVO, if that were truly the case, why would Alarm Force settle the patent infringement lawsuit & consent to a licensing agreement w/ REVO?

.... "REVO's President, Ronald Carter says, This is a major vindication for REVO and its shareholders. The settlement validates REVO's patents and also allows us to gain a new licensee through our agreement with Eyetalk365 LLC. It also proves and clearly demonstrates and substantiates the strength of our claims about the value, effectiveness and future of our patented technology. Through Eyetalk365 LLC, we plan to continue our strategy of protecting our patented intellectual property rights."

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/revolutionary-concepts-announces-its-licensee-settles-patent-infringement-lawsuit-and-signs-major-licensing-agreement-for-royalties-2015-04-17?siteid=bigcharts&dist=bigcharts

[jlax]

It's a cost benefit analysis. It's why many large companies settle even what seems to be a frivolous lawsuit to the layperson. Read the law journal article and then tell me what you think. I'm not trying to create controversy, I want to see this price move north so that would be counterintuitive.

[Bubba Gump]

That's true but REVO did win their recent case and proves validity in their patents. Future litigation can't be guaranteed with a favorable outcome but the fact they did win will help future cases in their favor. It says a lot when a court validates your products/story.