nuke661
Normally Ex posts are pretty strong, correct and make a good valuable point but I think your post alone ends this particular argument and the further discussion is now pointless. Good post.
Garnick really owes no one an explanation of his experience or track record.
If anyone else here has taken 10-17 major blockbusters to market please speak up.
I will take him at his word. PG
Your post quoted below.
"ex,
I believe this link should be sufficient to address the issue you raise:
The Drug Shortage Crisis in the United States
Although not specific as to company names, reading through the entire article will IMO, back up Dr. Garnick's statements. The fact is he said stumbled not failed. Since when does stumbling = failed? You changed stumbled to failed and not too subtlety either.
Why does it appear to me that you seem to want to minimize Dr Garnick's credibility and importance to the PPHM story? My first disagreement with you was when you were posting about how "common and un-exceptional" (my paraphrasing of the intent of those posts of yours) his background is and that we are putting too much emphasis on his work history. Some people just can't hide intent as well as they would like."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
