InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LowFloatGoat

05/25/06 11:38 AM

#55294 RE: petrotsar #55291

It looks like you are familiar with the report. It would take more than 5 minutes to digest the report the first time you look at it. That means you are one of a handful of previous posters who have analyzed it and actually understand it. What was your previous alias? Just curious.
icon url

rheddle

05/25/06 11:47 AM

#55302 RE: petrotsar #55291

Petrostar "proofs" should be "proves". Lurn ow tu spewl if u wont ani credibiliti on vis bored
icon url

Fishdog

05/25/06 11:57 AM

#55306 RE: petrotsar #55291

petro .... the price to play in the GOG goes up daily. The playing field in the JDZ, particularly, has changed significantly since OBO-1. To argue coulda-shoulda pre-OBO is not going to get you very far.
icon url

kuxe0

05/25/06 2:54 PM

#55387 RE: petrotsar #55291

Chinese pay best...

...for any oil reserves. They have so much paper dollars from huge trade surplus, that it is for China one of the best way to make use of the paper.

That was fact
@ Petrokazkhstan
@ the Akpo block and prooved again now
@ the Angola block

(each one billion $ deals).

If the ERHC deal in block 2 was so cheap, why did not Exxon or CVX do it ?

Can not get the logic of your arguments.

Sums which Sinopec & Cie. are paying to carry all future deepwater production costs for ERHC in block 2 will be not peanut money.