InvestorsHub Logo

Snizzle

04/16/15 9:58 AM

#28789 RE: Jayyy #28786

Jayyy~ doesn't matter how many times or different ways it's stated it's still the same thing. We all know there currently is no business so there is really no reason to file anything.


Read and reread the March 20 th press release.....it's pretty clear.

mysterymeat

04/17/15 10:55 AM

#28790 RE: Jayyy #28786

Your right, To Be Decided is not a business. "The resulting loss of not only existing business but also future business has been too much for the company to overcome."
Sounds like RENU is essentially back to being an empty shell.

"The company, in its lawsuit, seeks millions of dollars in damages for loss of business and loss of market share. Although Chief Legal Officer Alex Kim and I were personally targeted, this lawsuit was filed on behalf of the company and its shareholders who have also been damaged by the defamation and tortious interference with our companys operations."

By some strange miracle should Renuen actually win a settlement for the millions of dollars they seek, and by an even stranger miracle the defendants actually pay, the shareholders might get a couple of dollars from the settlement. For some reason, maybe Jeffery's history, I don't think that will happen. My guess is this case will drag on for so long that Renuen will terminate or dismiss the case because they can't pay their growing legal bills.

Alex Kim is not representing Renuen in this lawsuit. They are represented by:
Christian Joseph Graham &
Glenn T. Williams of:
Williams Law Firm
Ste 200
2273 Lee Rd
Winter Park, FL 32789-7214

T. Blake Finney,
Whitney C. Gibson,
& Adam C. Sherman of:
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, LLP
Suite 3500
301 E 4th St
Cincinnati, OH 45202