Replies to post #32663 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[jjsmith77]

Sigma Labs called INSPECT "closed loop process controller"

See for yourself. FROM SIGMA LABS:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.b6sigma.com%2Fuploads%2FDataSheets%2FPrintRite3D%2520Spec%2520Sheet_REV1.pdf&ei=dUwoVfnLLsr5ggTziYHoBQ&usg=AFQjCNGxbN9tCYlRjj5-30n0kfHVTB8dLQ&sig2=HmnFBoCLqdBc7pEgHBT5Fg&bvm=bv.90491159,d.eXY&cad=rja[/url]

[kanya]

Sorry your statement is not easy to understandable...
I also follow this board discussions for some two years now...

[$5.95akadawson-m]

"I promise if we had full closed-loop control we would not be at .11-.12 cents."

M Duffy:

That statement is, of course, complete speculation on your part. We have discussed
at length SGLB's visibility or non-visibility and the public awareness of SGLB, and
we have discussed the non-visibility of SGLB's cooperation with GE and other large
corps. The truth is there are many factors that influence the pps.

[stocker83]

I do understand that a patent could just be on idea but it has to be specific in terms of design and specs. You can't just patent for example flying without design specs on how to fly,etc