InvestorsHub Logo

Ragz2Richez

04/09/15 8:08 PM

#54694 RE: stervc #54692

Very impressive. Thank you for sharing! Stickie please!!!

StocksGoneWild

04/09/15 8:13 PM

#54695 RE: stervc #54692

Sterling...you're incredible bro! I really appreciate the time and effort. Eyes right salute!!!

GreenMachine

04/09/15 8:14 PM

#54696 RE: stervc #54692

You are the man! Thank you!

StocksGoneWild

04/09/15 8:15 PM

#54697 RE: stervc #54692

STICKY this post....STAT!

carlson

04/09/15 8:23 PM

#54698 RE: stervc #54692

stervc, Again a standing ovation post. I must say you really keep me wanting to ride IJJP a lot longer. I particularly like concern #6. But I imagine there are others that are more important.

Concern # 6 ** Some are disturbed with the fact that the participating public company issuers are all sub-penny stocks. That makes the whole program appear to be more scam like.

The focus on sub-penny companies as pie share issuer participants was in an effort to maximize the benefits associated with participating in the program. Secondarily, all of the participants are clients of my law firm and this firm has a policy of helping its clients succeed in their endeavors. The strategy is to finance the construction of the extremely profitable marijuana growing operations, in exchange for annual income of several times that amount.

By design, we have targeted small public companies, with minimum capitalization, or also clients of this firm, anticipating the maximum consequence to the market capitalization. Indeed, by design, the promised income dwarfs the value of the shares issued in exchange, maximizing the benefit to the shareholders of the company, which include the Pie Share Recipients. As such, with the magnitude of this income event facilitation, we are looking at a dramatic effect for the benefit of all. In short, by way of example, for $2,000,000 of annual income, in perpetuity, the participating public company issued stock, valued at only slightly in excess of that amount. Analytically, assuming the standard model of a 10% capitalization rate, $2,000,000 of annual income should increase the market capitalization by $20,000,000. For IJJ, by way of example, without giving effect to the redemption plan currently in effect, THIS ALONE SHOULD CAUSE A STOCK PRICE IN EXCESS OF ONE CENT PER SHARE, not even giving effect to the more dramatic market capitalization consequence attributable to the explosive marijuana field and its growth potential. This effect may even be exacerbated by the fact some of the public company participants are not even current in their filings and none of them are reporting companies. The hope is that each will soon be compliant and each will become a fully reporting OTCQB company.

I hope this is been helpful. I welcome the opportunity to clarify these matters.

Gooddolphin

04/09/15 8:31 PM

#54699 RE: stervc #54692

Thank you Mr stervc. Excellent post!

elkonig

04/09/15 8:50 PM

#54700 RE: stervc #54692

That post hurts my brain about IJJP and their partners. Why is Goulding responding to you about company matters? Shouldn't this information be disclosed to the SEC/OTC for all to view and not just a selected few on this board?

Chief Slapaho

04/09/15 9:40 PM

#54705 RE: stervc #54692

Great job, Sterling.

Having said this, some of his responses create more questions than provide answers to. Very prepared 'legal' responses.

Huggy Bear

04/09/15 10:00 PM

#54706 RE: stervc #54692

Section 3(a)(10) Is Available, in Exchange for “Property Interests”, As Well As Claims: Fortunately, and consistent with the statutory scheme and SEC pronouncements thereon, Section 3(a)(10) is not limited to resolving disputes and is not limited to exchanging securities for claims or other securities.



Goulding's take on the matter. Let's assume for arguments sake this facet of Section 3(a)(10) can be applied in this instance.

Can you point us to what property interests have been acquired with the public proceeds from the issuance of unrestricted free trading shares?

What physical properties have IJJP and the consortium acquired?

Just one simple question, for now.

MOMO

04/09/15 11:16 PM

#54715 RE: stervc #54692

very very impressive stervc

Ty810

04/09/15 11:37 PM

#54721 RE: stervc #54692

Great post!

homey_g

04/10/15 12:38 AM

#54727 RE: stervc #54692

Amazing post Sterling!

Simonb217

04/10/15 12:45 AM

#54729 RE: stervc #54692

If this does not make folks want to buy more shares then I am lost for words!!! Thanks for taking the time for this!!

cyberbullymouse

04/10/15 1:20 AM

#54734 RE: stervc #54692

Sterling, for your thoughts..,

Is the list of insider positions originally and accidentally exposed still in its previous state or have said positions fluctuated due to various factors of consideration commensurate with the reaction of investors to the flaccidity of this venture?

scubasteve11

04/10/15 5:41 AM

#54742 RE: stervc #54692

THANK YOU stervc for all your hard work and personal time in preparing this information to be shared with the board!!! We are a diamond in the rough here and ready to move up where we belong.

Take care, Steve!

mighty mouse

04/10/15 9:57 AM

#54779 RE: stervc #54692

thanks sterv, good news. let's get the pps moving on up.

bigbensbj

04/10/15 10:17 AM

#54791 RE: stervc #54692

This is an amazing post. This is the type of confidence Pope needs to be giving shareholders.

Slojab

04/10/15 11:52 PM

#54960 RE: stervc #54692

The hope is that each will soon be compliant and each will become a fully reporting OTCQB company

There's not a chance in Hell of that.

TradeUptrendz

04/11/15 10:27 AM

#54991 RE: stervc #54692

AMAZING POST $IJJP