InvestorsHub Logo

es1

04/09/15 12:00 PM

#147141 RE: akeygon #147137

The info came from Dan

then it would be in a company issued PR. Since it did not the info came from an anonymous poster stating opinion only. They could be 100% correct and the info they received could have come from Dan. But it is not factual unless it comes from the company.

at that time based on assumption Patrick would visit the property during past weekend.



Dan would not assume this. Patrick would have an appointment to visit the sight and I don't know about Dan or Scott but I would be there when he did it so I could be sure everything was done the way I wanted.

So I would be going when Patrick went. No assumption at all. I KNOW when we are going.

Dan KNOWS when Patrick is/has going/gone.

When he does go and returns and finishes the 43-101 Dan will tell us.

ANY statement made saying it will be on any set day is complete rumor and should not be posted as fact.

"Patrick is supposed to be there sunday according to what Dan said in an email."

OK that's awesome.
But if this is what was said in the email, this is the post we get on the boards...

"Patrick visited the site and the 43-101 should be out this week"

That's rumor.

I fully believe that Patrick intended on visiting sunday. I am unaware if he did or not.
Maybe he visited today or maybe next sunday but the visit being done and the 43-101 being complete are still an unknown.

You can bet that if we don't get a 43-101 this week and next Tuesday opens without a 43-101 the PPS will drop right back down to .011 or lower because the rumors were wrong.