Replies to post #297167 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)

[janice shell]

The only thing illegal here is someone posting information that is confidential to the company and was sent in a confidential private communication and not shared with the public.

I'm not getting it. Is NTEK doing a forward split, or not? As I said, if it is, the information is available from the Nevada SOS.

[shajandr]

Apple has NEVER used an NDA to prevent ANYONE from disclosing information about CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. Never.

They couldn't even if they wanted to. NDAs cannot prevent anyone from disclosing information about CRIMINAL activities. No US court will enforce an NDA to prevent someone from whistle-blowing or disclosing information about criminal activities - like conspiracy to commit securities fraud, insider tipping, market manipulation, or other illegal acts. Such as emails from NTEK persons to investors that is selectively disclosed.

Just as one cannot have a legally enforceable contract to kill someone or to sell illegal counterfeited game USB fobs for games that were never licensed from the original owners.

Note: irrelevant links about Apple going after people who leaked activity like rumors about iPhones and such are totally irrelevant.

[Crazy Money]

lolzzz more NTEK Apple rumors?

DavidRFoley99 Member Level Wednesday, 04/08/15 01:16:06 AM
Re: shajandr post# 297161
Post # of 297181
NDA's are completely enforceable, just ask Apple

[SurgeGuy2.0]

Nice posting of the REAL Fact Dave!

[B402]

Sounds like Someone Struck a Nerve Davy

Lots and LOTS of Shares being Dumped Too

Nice.to Know you are still
Monitoring Social Media

NTEK
Scam from Interception

[Asher78]

Hi Dave, remind us..when do you report to Federal Prison?
lol enjoy your last meal as a free man :-D

[PLUTUS]

Hey foley, you're going to prison. lolzzz

[theiceman13]

what about the information you leak to investor associates ahead of pending public disclosure so they can load? I dare you to deny it.

[makinezmoney]

So Foley is a Lawyer now ?

Maybe a Pro-bono lawyer...

QUOTE
" "

Any clauses in that NDA for anti-dumping shares, dilution, reverse splits, rinsing and repeating ?

No time for that... Tubby's Gotta PARTY !

[Sleepy2016]

In fact, in the next NDA that I draft, I’m thinking of emphasizing in bold font the sentence containing the core obligation

That will just make it boldly unenforceable. Email disclaimers are meaningless. You can't bind someone to an agreement just by telling them they are bound to an agreement.

[B402]

Only Scams Tag their PRs Davy

And Have Their Social Media people
Tout it as a PR from Another Co

source: NanoTech Entertainment
media contact info: Andy Marken, [phone], [e-mail]
tags: TECHNOLOGY
direct link to this photo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140929/149073


http://photos.prnewswire.com/medias/switch.do?prefix=/appnb&page=/getStoryRemapDetails.do&prnid=20140929%252f149073&action=details

[2bornot2b]

In case you missed my last suggestion to you...it's sometimes helpful to provide at least one source for some or all of the information you are providing and to use quotation marks when you are referencing someone else's work. Good Luck!

http://www.draftingpoints.com/page/3/

e.g.
"But here’s why NDAs matter…

All of that being said, NDAs—like all contracts—do matter. Here’s why:

1) The impact of disclosure restrictions on the disclosing party.The decision whether or not to enter into an NDA and to thereafter disclose information under the protection of that NDA might in fact depend upon the existence of another NDA by which the disclosing party is already bound. For example, it is not uncommon for an NDA to permit disclosure of confidential information so long as that disclosure is being made pursuant to a written contract containing non-disclosure and non-use provisions that are substantially as (or no less) stringent than those included in that NDA.

2) Enforceability. Also, the NDA might actually be enforceable! If the receiving party discloses or uses confidential information in contravention of the NDA, then the disclosing party might in fact be able to obtain an injunction to at least stop the leak at its source. Or the disclosing party might be able to obtain damages. But many will argue (often with merit) that the damage has already been done and any remedy under the NDA will be insufficient.

3) An NDA is better than your ability to enforce it in court. So what the disclosing party really wants to do is prevent the disclosure or use of confidential information in the first place. Does an NDA accomplish that (or at least increase the chances that a recipient will not disclose or use information) more effectively than a hearty handshake? I think that it does. This is because an NDA, like all contracts, has value beyond a party’s ability to enforce it in court. In my contract-drafting presentations, I claim that, in the context of your contract counterparty deciding whether or not to breach a provision of a contract, that contract is as good as:

your counterparty’s perception that you will seek to and successfully enforce it in court; plus
your counterparty’s assessment of any damage to its reputation should you seek to and successfully enforce it in court; plus
any sense of moral obligation that your counterparty might have in performing its obligations under the contract.
Even in the big bad world of business, don’t discount this last point; there is no doubt a psychological component to entering into a written NDA. Studies have shown that people are more likely to adhere to beliefs and positions that they articulate in the written word than the spoken word (and certainly more so than if those beliefs or positions are kept sheltered in their minds).

In fact, in the next NDA that I draft, I’m thinking of emphasizing in bold font the sentence containing the core obligation:

The Receiving Party shall not directly or indirectly disclose and shall not directly or indirectly use any Confidential Information.

I would bet that, after coming face-to-face with the emphasized version of that sentence, the Receiving Party would at least have second thoughts about disclosing Confidential Information, even if it knew that the chances of it incurring damages or getting caught would be relatively low.



And so, with that being said:"

[protagonist12]

When does your American Greed episode air, I wanna make sure I have my DVR set

[Crazy Money]

Lock the NTEK float?

[Crazy Money]

How many yearzzz ago was your order for me to never respond to you on iHub>? lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz