Replies to post #87606 on Treaty Energy Corp. (fka TECO)

[SCHNAUSER]

I wouldn't know and really don't care about naked shorters. I'm not invested in Treaty. I know better than that.

[kanola]

Agreed. If the case were to go in favor of The SEC, the NSS will not have to cover nearly 100 M shares pulled from thin air.

But in reality, it does not matter on the decision of the FAB 5. Treaty ( Chris T ) and The SEC have worked out an fair agreement that protects the company and it's shareholders. Or Chris T would not be wasting his time.
It's not the position to purposely put Treaty out of business. Their job is to protect the shareholders. The agreement reached will be within the guidelines of the permitted as written by the U S Congress. Not at the discretion of The SEC.

DREAMING THE CASE WILL BE A " SLAM BUNK " DOESN'T ALTER THE FACT THAT IT WON'T

TREATY WILL BE JUST FINE AND THANK GOODNESS FOR THOSE BRAVE SOULS BATTLING THE OUTSIDE ELEMENTS ON A DAILY BASIS. IN THEM WE TRUST