InvestorsHub Logo

gotmilk

03/23/15 4:55 PM

#23089 RE: MerthyrQ #23086

re: "a positive indicator" For the hurting in the dark Bourque Industries shareholders requires a substance of hope and expectation that their investments into this company will reflect how John Bourque represented this company to the public, that being the content on the company web site.

Its known that "a positive indicator" in general terms indicates the existence or presence of a suspected condition or pathogen, and in regards to the history of what has been edited or added or removed from the content on the company web site, that perceived by the shareholders to become aware of actual true status of Bourque Industries has resulted into an unbroken trail of utter contempt towards any actions represented on the part of management for whatever changes they so deem necessary on the company web site.

So yes, the removal of "Current Projects" is that indication, perhaps this time done in truth to depict an actual change from expected, that being a project anticipated from the return of John Bourque has been deleted/removed (aka non-existence) simply because John Bourque's engagement with the research & development of Kryron has been cancelled with the newly arrived status that he will remain in jail/prison without bail pending a new trial.

This is of course just a continuation of an uninterrupted chain of events that required past and current management to signal to the hurting shareholders that whatever positive expectations they obtained from the company web site is now no longer in play, that is, the "game" has been cancelled as Bourque Industries no longer has any "players" able to "score" a "run."

doug

gotmilk

03/28/15 6:38 PM

#23112 RE: MerthyrQ #23086

re: "fact [of] management activity [on company website]"

Gosh, Is this new?



gotmilk

04/03/15 5:36 PM

#23131 RE: MerthyrQ #23086

Good News MerthyrQ,

Based on your logic that it shows that Bourque Industries management is active and working to protect the investment of the hurting in the dark shareholders.

Yes, they decided to follow the positive activity of removing any mention of "Current Projects" with yet another positive removal from the company web site, that being the number of hambur... err, visits to the company web site.

Gosh, with the presence of this recent activity we hurting BORK holders can go on high alert and expect more and more removals, perhaps current management will explode with massive positive actions and blank out all content on the company web site.

As you stated: "Action represents the presence of current action on the part of management. That is a positive event. This remains so even in the face of ignorance on the part of shareholders."

Just a simple question, what do you mean by "... in the face of ignorance on the part of shareholders."

As the hurting shareholders I deem as "in the dark," not being of "ignorance."

thanks doug