InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

03/19/15 2:48 PM

#24856 RE: Na$ty19 #24854

That's kind of what I figured... ie, you could I supposed, by appointment only, use an office and/or conference rooms, it would logically seem. And I would absolute assume that the operator or phone automated system would route callers to a fwd # or a voice mail. Something along those lines. And I have no problem w/such an austere setup, for a company that simply can't afford and/or doesn't need the overhead of more than that, which, when you think about CERTAIN aspects of this SUPPOSED operation, such could be a very workable setup. BUT...... when company lists their # and business callers are greeted with "never heard if them...they ain't here" (which is basically what we reported to be the case) that is bad, REAL bad & quite SUSPECT. Also, SUPPOSEDLY, in the past, the company told us they did all sorts of testing of the old voip service provider infrastructure as well as all there supposed communications with FORTUNE 500 & S & P 500 folks & had all sorts of MEETINGS & such........well, ahh, how can that BE.....?...... with no working phone or any office and the operator says no such company here. Now lookit....most likely the you know who's will come on here & as usual, explain above away....as tho this was nothing AND also ridicule it in the same manner as conspiracy theorists usually get ridiculed. I say, if there is no push for a true explanation of how this can possibly be ok or good, that amount to enabling any possible scamming going on (or even if gross incompetence). And I'll tell you what else, if a company can not come thru on their promises for all this time AND considering ALL the very serious inconsistencies that's been revealed here by the dozens, and ALL the fluff/vapor PR's, musical BOD positions, wrong pics of execs, no update on Southbank, no return of or word on the 100 mil shares, no sales, no promised market listing upgrade, admission that past imminent deals were bogus, admission that past interest from F500 companies was bogus, long periods of time, at critical junctions, with no updates from company, reports of no returned calls and/or emails from the vast majority of those who said they tried more recently, and of those who purported their calls/email WERE answered, has come not a single word of what specifically was the substance of any such contacts (which to me, means all such claims are nothing more or less than a total crock), the stepping down as CEO of such a propped & revered guy, unexpectedly, with no explanation or indication why, other than "personal", the unexplained & without warning 100% abandonment of a yrs long buildup & cultivation of the original voip teleco service provider company operation, PR's that indicate ongoing support activities (in this case, USPTO patent activity) which is supposed to show its all very real, and it simply goes on & on with seemingly no end.....thus is it unreasonable, considering that all above are true to the best of ability using available info....to seriously consider this play to be a scam or a blatant example of major malfeasance or major malfunctioning mngmnt? In fact, I think one would have to be seriously lacking in judgement, to put it nicely, to NOT think so AND instead to be treated as tho such considerations are whack. That is critical thinking????