InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PumpersExposed

03/18/15 5:48 PM

#18090 RE: SoxFan #18086

Honestly Gregg sounded like he was trying to convince people that he has prospects but he has no clue if any are real.

And what are the proposals? He keeps mentioning companies have shipped him oil samples. What is the point of that if even the actual onsite testing was not sufficient power-wise..etc? Obviously the lab and the claims made therin do not show up in the real world so how useless is it to do that? Are these the proposals? Are they more like the Haven proposal? If Haven dumped STWA and not the other way around then that would be a real laugh! All "investors" need to know is the TCPL AOT is sitting in some building somewhere collecting dust. Any made-up talk about some fantasy 75% won't change that. zero123 its gone!

The company currently has four proposals outstanding and in the event that we’re successful in negotiating a conclusion to any of those opportunities, our assets could be moved either through a lease or direct sales effort and they could be moved immediately.

ALways "could"! Never "WILL"!


Dra chemicals are added at a few parts per million rate. Its relatively small percentage of an operators costs.


Plus DRA's can be separated and re-used, or sold once separated.
I helped build the original line for Access before the expansions. This project was 2 lines. 1 24" for the blend (dilbit) coming south to Sturgeon terminal in Redwater, and a smaller 16" line to ship the separated (and new) DRA north.
icon url

DCorleone

03/18/15 9:18 PM

#18094 RE: SoxFan #18086

STWA deficit grew to 97 Million. They are GROWING?