Replies to post #7475 on KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[wilma6311]

Then I am also saying this...

Confusing.

(1) Somewhere along the way the shell company becomes dissolved. That is what appears to have happened to KEYO.

(2) But I would think that the timing of the dissolution would be of importance, for it would seem that, to get the new entity active under the old shell, the shell would still have to be "active" and not dissolved. For how can they complete the paperwork if there is not 2 active parties involved in the transaction?

(3) Hence, one of 2 things appear to be in play:

(a) Either the merger transaction has been completed and a new entity has assumed the SEC standings once held by KEYO, which then, and only then, allows the owners of KEYO to render her dissolved, or

(b) There has been no merger and KEYO has been dissolved.

If (a) has actually happened, then there must be paperwork available to the public. Is there?

I would think that the news media would have picked up on a merger and would be all over it. I haven't seen or heard anything in the news. Have you?

I guess it comes down to this:

(1) In a legal sense, and as the SEC views it, what is meant by dissolution? Is the game over? Has a dissolved company lost all recognition from the SEC and the Stock Exchanges?

If the SEC won't recognize KEYO now as a legitimate entity, and a merger has not happened using the KEYO shell, then it is over and done with.