Replies to post #12687 on DarioHealth Corp (DRIO)

[x1power]

Who else had to do an ' elevated altitude study', e.g. all the blood test meter companies? I am assuming the test is for vacations to mountain resort and air liner flight situations of blood device uses?

China folk (in 2007) who developed the 'Urine Battery' for powering a cellphone for say 30 minutes (with peep or salt water) . . . mentioned at the time . . . that 'other bodily fluids' could also power a cell phone or LED . . . spit and blood to name two. EMF of their battery design depended on battery plate size and battery circuit: parallel or series. Did DRIO blood mobile meter developers kind of piggy-backed on the Chinese
idea of creating a mobile 3rd-world blood monitoring health care tool? Diagnosis blood monitoring mini-chips, have been around since the 1980s.

Combine the two ideas, and what do you have? Plus add some SW and include a doggle porting to a cell phone.

Any news from Paris show?

Daily volume is terrible . . . maybe time to hire a stock promo show? Wondering if free test kits to Congress and Senate, could get some FDA phone calls? I mean Bibi got free USA taxpayer paid election coverage . . . right?

One could say DRIO is 'basing' . . . but for resistance or support?

So . . . who now owning most of DRIO stock shares . . . Retail investors or 'the insiders' + the private placement loan holder?
Just me . . . but I do believe its the private placement loan holder. Worse case, do a Donald Trump Tax Maneuver and pay yourself a big salary/commission in the proceeding court doc?

[Vaffan-Coulo]

"...NIH-Funded Trials", does this have to with the delay..."????

Wellllllll...since it's NOT an NIH funded trial bur a DRIO SHAREHOLDER funded trial, I wouls be inclined to think NOT.

Moreover, WHY did they do an "altitude study"? The dario uses one of the same methodologies that all other glucometers use. Since the FDA application ONLY compares the dario to those devices that are ALREADY approved, one MIGHT rationally presume that altitude effects are ALREADY understood.

For that matter, why waste time, effort, and money doing ANY trials at ALL? A 510K application does NOT require ANY clinical trial since ALL it does is compare the device to other ALREADY approved devices.