Replies to post #29105 on OncoSec Medical Inc (ONCSQ)

[trading.jeff]

$ONCS I saw the same. Here are some of the replies:

@PunitDhillon what are these external pressures you are referring to? Share price or something else? Please be more specific!

@tupy_tinh @Ken_Kulig I'm surprised it's not obvious to u what Im referring to.. Having to deal w/ negative market this week on speculation

@tupy_tinh @Ken_Kulig & for the record if there was anything materially negative concerning @Oncosec it would have to be publicly disclosed

(Comment on the two tweets immediately above: Punit's fuse seems to be growing shorter and shorter. IMO.)

@PunitDhillon please try to have the investor webinar scheduled soon so you can clear up any misconceptions/concerns about the company/stock

@punitdhillon thx for clarifying but pressures were not unexpected as you have delayed 1st patient Q1 to Q2 without explaining why.

All of the above tweets, and others which I chose not to post, can be seen here:

A tough week @Oncosec this week due to unexpected external pressures... But we are not letting down & looking fwd to pushing ahead! #build

— Punit Dhillon (@PunitDhillon) March 14, 2015

I have been one of Punit's strongest supporters for as long as I've been invested in OncoSec, which has been almost from the inception of the company. However, I haven't communicated with him since sometime last year. Actually, to clarify, I have reached out to him a few times over the past several months but haven't received replies to either my emails or my tweets. He used to reply immediately and enthusiastically to my emails/tweets. (I've only spoken to him by phone once and he was quite forthcoming with what he could tell me.)

I still believe in OncoSec as a company as there has been no turnover of personnel (Mr. and Mrs. Dr. Pierce are two examples). These individuals must also believe in OncoSec; otherwise, they would have bailed a long time ago. Merck and OncoSec's other collaborators are still involved in their joint investigations which indicates that OncoSec is seen as a viable company. There will be room for many companies that are fighting various types of cancer using electroporation and OncoSec, as an independent company or one that will be purchased/absorbed/partnered with by another, will be one of them.

I commend Punit on how he started out as a "one man army" and has brought OncoSec to where it is, now, but, I am starting to see what others have been saying, that, maybe it's time to change bus drivers before Punit throws OncoSec, its personnel, and its shareholders under it.

Other than the tweets, this post is entirely IMO.