100% incorrect, quote, "$OCAT needed $7 to $8 mil of cash and cash equivalence to list on the NASDAQ Global. How did this happen??? "
The Nasdaq global market DOES NOT have a minimum shareholder positive equity requirement as does the Nasdaq "Capital Market" (CM) tier.
The ONLY requirement for the Nasdaq "Global Market" is the following per the table on page 8 of the below published Nasdaq market "listing requirements":
1) Market Value Of listed securities at least $75 million
2) Public held shares at least 1.1 million
3) Market value of public held shares at least $20 million
4) Minimum share price of $4 a share
5) Minimum number of shareholders at least 400
6) Minimum number of market maker 4
THAT IS IT.
So how did they list on the Global tier? Easy- just read the above requirements. No big deal- they met those requirements so they listed. No mystery here or anything to be implied or whatever? Totally straight forward.
No capital/cash on-hand requirement and no minimum shareholder equity of at least $4 million as on the Nasdaq "Capital Market" tier.
It is possible (1) that the Nasdaq review committee gave credit for the "$18.6 million dollars available to us under our arrangement with Lincoln Park Capital" to meet the the $ mil cash (equity) and/or (2) $OCAT has a JV partner, Pharma and/or Financial, lined up which met the Committee's acceptance.
Since $OCAT has less than $1 mil revenue, the two cases that $OCAT would be eligible for are IMO:
(1) Equity Standard...Stockholders’ Equity..$30 million
(2)Market Value Standard...Market Value of Listed Securities..$75 million
Which supposedly is different than the current Market Value of Publicly Held Shares for case (1) $18 million and case (2) $20 million respectively. $OCAT current Market Cap=$228 mil.
In the CC, PW completely avoids answering the financing question:
If PW is completing a "Financial Deal" in Black-Out Period mode than that would explain why he completely avoided the financial question by the analyst Jason Kolbert. Also $OCAT has not released the 10-K yet which may or may not explain the forward financing.