InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

honestabe13

03/12/15 7:34 PM

#210700 RE: PPHMVERYLONG #210699

long...

first time in a long time...i think it might not be 2 or 3 more years....

reading between lines...share price could take off any day.

and I am no pumper.
icon url

Protector

03/12/15 7:34 PM

#210701 RE: PPHMVERYLONG #210699

Well if a gross profit that covers 15% of burn-rate doesn't mean anything for a small cap biotech that normally has no REGULAR and CONTINUES revenue and depends on giving away its pipelines for breadcrumbs to BPs that will milk the cow if it get somewhere then I don't know.

Furthermore, as of JUN 2015 that revenue will likely start to double with a BACKLOG of 29 Milj$ and a new forecast of 23-15Milj$ and a new facility that allows us to produce all that in half of the time.

Double revenue means PPHM has about 5Milj$ per quarter gross profit. Furthermore the gross profit should drastically increase when in the new facility we use single use reactors instead of the old ones, as announced.

So PPHM is heading to sponsor about 25-33% of its own burn-rate and that for a small cap biotech. Find another one.
icon url

bidrite

03/13/15 8:20 AM

#210759 RE: PPHMVERYLONG #210699

partnership in the OLD-SENSE of that word (with a controlling BP suffocating the company)



It is $7M extra per year, which represents a 33% increase YoY. That is HUGE in any industry. You really missed the mark on that criticism.