Replies to post #61872 on Discovery Minerals LTD (DSCR)

[galette]

Thank you!

DSCR

[Dominic3]

Nice info thanks

[untamed72]

Moreover, cryogenetic environments produces the highest grade product when making marijuana infused product.

[MaxPowerLove$Ihub]

Great info.


- Go DSCR

[Proprium]

A Thank you and mm from me.

[getsmarter82]

I want to repost this because it was late when I typed it up and I'm not sure everybody had a chance to read it before it got buried by the "GM DSCR!" posts.

As a biochemistry graduate, I fail to see how freezing temperatures could render a CBD molecule "useless." The only place I have seen this idea has been on this board, and no one has ever provided a source.
CBD is a small molecule that will not be damaged by ice crystal formation. If anything low temperatures would preserve the CBD molecules by slowing down any CBD degrading reactions.

After some quick research this is what I found:
CBD is photosensitive and prone to air oxidation: this means that if exposed to air or light the CBD will react and become CBN.
CBD when it is still in the plant (the stalks and stems) is protected from air and (for the most part) light.
CBD, once extracted from the plant, degrades to CBN fairly quickly if stored at 5 degrees C and above- CBD CAN BE STORED FOR YEARS IF TEMPERATURE IS KEPT AT OR BELOW 4 DEGREES CELCIUS.

This is the paper from which I drew my information about temperature:
http://www.academia.edu/3315540/The_Influence_of_Long-term_Storage_Conditions_on_the_Stability_of_Cannabinoids_derived_from_Cannabis_Resin

In my scientific opinion:
Anyone telling you that the stalks, leaves, and stems were frozen and therefore rendered unusable is a lying bastard trying to acquire cheap shares at your loss.

Furthermore anyone with any critical thinking skills should be questioning such individuals thusly:
-How do you know the plant material was frozen?
-Are you purporting to have some kind of inside knowledge? <--If the answer is "yes" this is probably the most incriminating indication that the claimant does NOT.
-What are the scientific objective sources for the claims you are making?

The onus is on the person who presents information to verify their claims, and if they do not, and you cannot verify their claims yourself, it is highly likely their information is suspect.

[Dominic3]

You can grow this POS in Mars... Lol

[ejmyers]

If the plants froze, the water could expand enough to crack the fibers and allow air and light in to start degrading the desirable plant material. If the plants froze before being fully harvested and processed, then they likely were beat up, frozen, partially thawed, maybe frozen again before being able to store them properly. Thats a lot of wear and tear on a plant that holds an air and light sensitive component that you wish to extract.
In addition, our conclusions of nothing to report without proof are just as valid as your claims of glory with no proof. The only difference is we have the companies own words backing up our conclusions that there was nothing to report. Remember how they let us know exactly how much oil they expected to harvest and that they would update us as information was available? Well I seem to have missed all the updates after the crappy razor video shot of the crop.

[elkonig]

So after all that being said where is the oil they were going to extract? The harvest would have been 5 or 6 months ago now.