InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

louieforpar

03/06/15 10:28 AM

#73391 RE: louieforpar #73390

Great theory LFP.Now here is some DD you won't find posted in the i-box.


The problem is this company started out with just a slight deviation from the former scam(SEVM).This time(EVRM) used the "government" to hide behind when getting pressure from shareholders.A luxury the did not have with SEVM,they learned from that mistake.Now they keep/kept shareholders interested by giving the illusion that something is just around the corner.IT WAS ALL BY DESIGN!!!!

It was a well concerted effort by the company and the paid compensated team to not only give shareholders the shaft,but by the same token they have used the disabled community as well.(See postings in the i-box).

Again,i'm quite sure the bigs have been able to compensate the company for the use/designation that EVRM was able to obtain thru "disability",all while gaining contracts due in part that the "public' viewed the bigs as a company(s) doing business with a disabled status company.A win-win for both.
Now five years later some either still believe in the i-box lure,or they think somehow in a mysterious way the company will all of a sudden start gaining contracts.That's the part i don't get.

One does not need to believe in my posts,rather for five years this company has not done one thing and will continue to do nothing. Dick taking the money was just a deterent for the company,a blessing in disguise if you will.I mean it gave the company almost 18 months to say that they are in the middle of a lawsuit.
And my answer to that very topic on the Conference call was...what happened the previous four years before the suit? It does not take rocket science to see what the Only intent of this company from the start was all about.

Same template as with SEVM,only difference with EVRM is they can hide behind the government,And most here are still buying what the company is shoveling
icon url

ShadowNT

03/06/15 2:42 PM

#73400 RE: louieforpar #73390

Why do you keep insisting RW is going to be given STS back???
STS was bought out by EVRM - it is a WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY. RW sold out his company and took a lesser position under JS. The company now belongs to us the shareholders of EVRM - not RW

Nobody has still given me an outcome in which RW wins the case - it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Not to mention the fact RW has been sued plenty of times before - for finance issues no less.

People are replaceable dude - RW isn't the only person able to gain contracts or have certain status'

And EVRM is not just about an iris scanner - in fact most of their business is in other related fields with the software, networks, and IT... The implementation was their second phase of their plans from years ago. Just because they haven't got to that phase of their plans yet doesn't mean it is a failing business. They have and still are creating revenues through phase 1 - and have holding on through some tough times - so there's only room to improve going forward.

The past means nothing here... some of us invested much later than 8 years ago - and thus have very different expectations. Some of us were not involved when this was SEVM and frankly don't give a darn because EVRM is a totally different company and aside from a lack of communication from the company - which is likely not their fault - you can't really disclose sensitive info.) - they have done a fairly good job running it since I've gotten in.

I already explained very clearly the 80-100M valuation - and they were spot on.