InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lobogotti

05/16/06 4:08 PM

#253598 RE: skunksyard #253597

your argument is tired.....you have no facts to back up your statements

the network would be supported if it had been handled properly.
icon url

zandant

05/16/06 4:08 PM

#253601 RE: skunksyard #253597

"...who can lose when you have the big $$$'s behind you and that's not the GLBT community, but VIACOM."

Hello skunks....If they had POS Olsen at the helm, they could have had Viacom, Disney and the Christian Broadcasting Network behind them and it still would have been a loser. :)


icon url

XV19

05/16/06 4:14 PM

#253614 RE: skunksyard #253597


What a joke....we invested in a product that is not supported. That's the bottom line.


wrong. We invsted in a stock that promised US, as shareholders, THE MOON, and delivered lies, pr's full of untruths, deciept, massive dillution WITHOUT shareholder approval, and unkept financial records.

There is no doubt that WE supported THE COMPANY with our purchase of their stock (some of us own Viacom as well). The fact that SENIOR MANAGMENT ran this company into the ground is NOT the fault of shareholders or subscribers.

You certainly don't read about Planet Out or Viacom or Here! having issues with support?

YOU CAN NOT BLAME THE COMMUNITY FOR THIS, ANNE. STOP doing it.


icon url

djr63

05/16/06 4:18 PM

#253625 RE: skunksyard #253597

"What a joke....we invested in a product that is not supported."

****************

QTN wasn't supported because most people couldn't get it on their cable providers and those that did saw that 90% of what was showing on it was shit.

And since LOGO only took a year to "become one of the most recognizable brands within the gay and lesbian community"...I guess that shoots your theory of gays not supporting each other doesn't it?
































































now fuck off you stupid bitch.

icon url

Drumchops

05/16/06 4:39 PM

#253669 RE: skunksyard #253597

It's coming to me.... yes... yes..