Replies to post #17125 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[HwyRanger]

Good points Wackywinston. All of them.

[zerosum]

but 75% ....the savings in power and thus expenditure are
simply fantastic...how can that be resistible or not part of
a package that is irresistible ?

Is not this level of saving clearly equatable with huge
financial gains for all customers.? is it not a more
basic economy than the viscosity issue which is also another
gain in terms of flow/volume/DRA's etc ?

Agree Whacky, It is fantastic. Amazing in fact. It won't be resistible, it's just a matter of pricing and at a 75% savings it's looking good for the AOT and STWA on that front.

AND what a trest to see that they could not believe the results
of the first tests...and so had it verified by independents

2 separate tests? I'm still wondering if I'm reading this correctly. Does this tell us there were actually 2 separate tests on the Keystone? Agreed, it sounds like the test results were so amazing they didn't believe the initial test results so they did a second test!

This past summer Tao and his colleagues also successfully tested the AOT device on a section of the Keystone pipeline near Wichita, Kansas.

"People were amazed at the energy savings when we first tested this device. They didn't initially understand the physics," said Tao. "A second test with an independent company was arranged and found the same thing." Tests on a section of the Keystone pipeline found that the same flow rate could be achieved with a 75 percent reduction of pump power from 2.8 megawatts to 0.7 megawatts, thanks to the AOT device. The device itself uses 720 watts.