InvestorsHub Logo

joseph pareti

02/26/15 2:45 AM

#139430 RE: Unkwn #139429

it is exactly because of these arguments that I am questioning the down moves more than anything else (e.g. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=111137484)

chipguy

02/26/15 8:55 AM

#139435 RE: Unkwn #139429

They won't be the best foundry out there, especially not without a process lead, which they are about to lose at 10nm I suspect (or just a very thin lead).

Say what?

Dmcq

02/26/15 9:49 AM

#139437 RE: Unkwn #139429

I am telling you, if they don't pull all the triggers they have with Goldmont and the transition to 10nm, they are out of this business and the risk of holding Intel increases a lot. They won't be the best foundry out there, especially not without a process lead, which they are about to lose at 10nm I suspect (or just a very thin lead).


Goldmont isn't central to Intel's business. How well it is designed has very little to do with the fabs. And I really can't see how they are going to lose their process lead in any relevant timescale with the amount they invest into it and their interest in keeping a performance lead.

wbmw

02/26/15 6:05 PM

#139448 RE: Unkwn #139429

I am telling you, if they don't pull all the triggers they have with Goldmont and the transition to 10nm, they are out of this business and the risk of holding Intel increases a lot.


You are dead wrong.