InvestorsHub Logo

kbbccandyman

02/26/15 7:53 AM

#23001 RE: gotmilk #23000

So, what would happen if someone reverse engineered the KRYRON and filed a patent with all the missing procedures and ingredients with a few new twists ... I would think that someone else would also have a valid patent. Thus rendering JB's patents defenseless. Therefore leaving out some essential things from a patent could cause JB to not want to be very forthcoming about his "magic dust" which has apparently been the case.

Not being able to or not wanting to answer questions about the
basic properties of KRYRON is one of the key issues that caused Ultra Armor to lose interest in KRYRON. Not being fully protected
with the KRYRON patents put JB in a position of not being able to put his cards on the table created a great deal of doubt among the
"big boys" in the tactical armor industry. They are serious players
and probably don't want to spend much time or energy with someone with a criminal history that is not being open and honest with them.

Could explain why KRYRON went no where. Maybe JB needs to go back to the drawing board, get the patents "rock solid", be more straight forward, bring in someone like Robert Reiger to move it forward and get out of the way. Intergrity and honesty will go a long way in advancing any venture. JB doesn't hasve it, has never had it and probably never will.

kbbccandyman

02/28/15 10:35 PM

#23011 RE: gotmilk #23000

MerthyrQ ... I'm curious as to exactly what did you witness being made and how do you know these "others" were not given additional information about the process/materials from JB? Did you actually witness the process or witness the product after it was
reproduced? Just trying to have a clear understanding of what you were saying in your quote below.


"It has been long known that JB was holding the fine details close. Others who reproduced what I witnessed had sufficient skills to duplicate the process without JB's help. That means the patent requirement is met."