InvestorsHub Logo

Jason Coombs

02/25/15 3:32 PM

#4993 RE: namtae #4992

The only future activity that I can control is my own effort to build my startups. As long as Bill and Shelly are not engaged in fraud then I will tolerate the continued existence of ADIA despite all that ADIA has done already that would justify the death penalty for it as a public company.

If Bill and Shelly wish to redeem themselves through future effort at obeying the law and being honest and ethical, that is purely on them.

You are incorrect if you believe I should possess the power to control what Bill and Shelly do. That's not what "fiduciary" means -- I do not have and never did have a duty to force other people not to be stupid, only to ensure that the value over which I do have control does not get lost or destroyed and that the probiotics business, or whatever ADIA becomes next, is a legitimate company operated for the legitimate benefit of its shareholders.

Jason Coombs

02/25/15 3:48 PM

#4995 RE: namtae #4992

Also in my original message the paths forward being referenced included the option on the table now, waiting for a decision through the lawyer, of allowing ADIA to become Homeland Forensics, Inc. as it was going to become prior to 2011.

I am willing to move forward in that manner, or with a spin-out of Homeland Forensics, Inc. and Public Startup Company, Inc. -- a third path in which law enforcement make arrests or a fourth path in which Bill and Shelly try to bankrupt or otherwise destroy ADIA out of pure malice just to try to prohibit me from granting equity ownership in my startups to the people who legitimately own them already, these options are each satisfactory to me.

In any event, there will be a final resolution and forward progress on my end for the benefit of shareholders. THAT IS fiduciary duty.