InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Frustrated

02/23/15 10:14 AM

#207197 RE: PGG76109 #207194

Sad for the cancer patients who thought they were getting a shot at a new revolutionary drug in the PPHM P2 trial.

I believe that statement should be forwarded to the BOD and mgmt as they are the ones who have not moved the drugs at a fast enough pace and they are the ones whose trial was botched under their watch. Stock at $1.26 says enough.

PPHM THE COMPANY THAT HAS BEEN LOOKING TO ADD QUALIFIED BOARD MEMBERS SINCE 2010 YET CAN'T FIND A MATCH WITH THE CURRENT CREDENTIALS OF OUR BOD AND THEIR PENNY STOCK PEDIGREE. 75% OF THE BOARD HAS TIES TO PATRIOTIC SCIENTIFIC WHICH NOW TRADES AT 5 PENNIES YET THE COMPANY CLAIMS TO HAVE AN INDEPENDENT BOD.

PPHM THE COMPANY WHOSE CEO IN MARCH 2014 TALKED ABOUT A PARTNERSHIP COMING TO FRUITION IN UPCOMING YEAR. IT IS NOW FEBRUARY 23, 2015, 54 days past the year 2014. CREDIBILITY IS AN ISUUE. ALL IMO.

icon url

InternetForumUser

02/23/15 11:09 AM

#207208 RE: PGG76109 #207194

Those statements are NOT PROOF!!!! They are merely allegations which were made by the Plaintiff (PPHM). Yes, it seems more likely to be true than false; however, it is not PROOF of the TRUTH. Even if the Peregrine Guys stated they would say the exact same thing under oath does not mean they actually WILL.

It is very similar to the Confidential Witness Testimonies because what they stated does not mean everything is factual and truthful.

That is what I find so odd on this board, because so many take bits and pieces from the Court Filings and mark them as FACT and TRUTH, yet, they omit the other statements which do not put Peregrine in a Good Light as Baseless Non-Truths....