That explains nothing. For years The Ewic was representing that HT was working on and performed work on the audit when in fact HT never did anything for HH, audit or no audit. If you believe that HT was indeed performing audit services for HH, then a monumental waste of money was incurred when the auditors were switched. Auditing firms don't accept the work product of other firms. They have to redo the audit from scratch themselves for them to attest to the veracity of an audit which they personally sign off on and they charge appropriately.
Do you believe HH payed twice for this thereby damaging the company? I don't, because I know HT never was paid anything by HH. These multi-year references about HH working with HT were just a pack of lies.
And yes, I do read the blogs.....I don't no why, but I generally do.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
