Yes I did. Not only did I read the amended version you quoted, but also the original - both clearly state the transaction was a grant, not a purchase.
This was no mathematical mistake - Baltia’s attorney entered 1,000,000 instead of 10,000,000 in Table I, Block 4. Bone-headed blunder perhaps, but there was no arithmetical calculation error involved there.
By the way...”...showed the verified payment of $100,0000...” - what kind of number is that? Was this another mathematical mistake? Where in the Form 4 (either one) was the verified payment entered?
Maybe Baltia should consider another attorney - this one seems to work a little sloppy...but then again, he definitely fits right in with this company...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
