InvestorsHub Logo

JohnCM

02/15/15 10:10 AM

#18168 RE: andrewflying #18167

according to nasdaq, the inst. ownership is now less than 20%. two more inst. sold their positions. does not look good.



Actually it looks great. Buy shares cheap after the institutions sold.

nagoya1

02/15/15 10:31 AM

#18169 RE: andrewflying #18167

Care to share where Blackrock is located in your "informative" post about BAA.

Funny how it's not anywhere in your Nasdaq site, and the recent insider buys aren't updated.

The info is only 3 months late.

No boogieman at BAA, won't scare longs with stale info.

BAA


I'd suggest flying with updated info.

braised007

02/15/15 10:34 AM

#18170 RE: andrewflying #18167

Yeah - obviously the higher that number the better. That being said we are seeing mutual fund groups selling. They generally don't really hold distressed securities in their funds. They could very well be pulling out and waiting for Banro to get their act together. For them, missing out on a 100-200% rally from these levels ($0.15ish) isn't a big deal when you could get back in at $0.40ish with an improved balance sheet and 2 mines at full production - then catch the 100-1000% rally from there.

The selling by them has picked up with the delay in Twangiza forward sale agreement and no news on Namoya streaming agreement. Im certain the ownership number would be hanging in the rafters if those deals would have closed in October/November as originally planned.

Techamental Logic

02/15/15 11:37 AM

#18171 RE: andrewflying #18167

BAA institutional ownership is over 60%. NASDAQ only reports what it receives via Form 13-F filings with the SEC. There are over 100M shares of BAA held by institutions that don't file 13-F's with the SEC.

http://holdings.nasdaq.com/asp/help/FAQ.asp

Morningstar.com tracks a much more complete list. They are an investment research firm which means they don't limit themselves to SEC filings but attempt to provide as much research as possible in the hopes of attracting business.

http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-overview.html?t=BAA

As to why many of those companies don't file 13F's I could write a book but I'll try not to. BAA is dual listed on the TSX and AMEX so some of those institutions file with SEDAR instead of EDGAR. Some don't file with either. For example BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A. owns 14.9M but they aren't required to file a 13F most likely because they don't use the US Mail or engage in interstate commerce.

The interesting one is BlackRock Advisors LLC. They do file a 13F...yet they don't list BAA. Why I do not know. Maybe it has something to do with them being a bondholder (that's a wild guess) but it is beyond me especially since they do file an SC-13G with EDGAR showing their BAA holdings.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1286597/000108636415000025/banro.corp.txt

The link below is a complete listing of all the stocks that BlackRock Advisors LLC listed in their latest 13F which they filed on 12/31/2014. They list 3,832 securities but BAA is not one of them. To save you some time you can jump right to page 15 which is where BAA would be if they listed it. Right there between BA and BABA on line number 368.

http://whalewisdom.com/filer/blackrock-advisors-llc