All good questions, ssc, and I don't have an answer. Hopefully, when the researchers at MD Anderson are finished, all of that will become a moot point. I originally thought that it wasn't the best strategy to turn disruptive technology over to the industry that the technology threatens to disrupt for validation because it would be easy then, for the industry to "dismiss" it in defense of its own lunch money. Much in the same way the licensee of a nano structured metal may see that product as a threat and pay for the rights to it just to keep it suppressed. I sincerely hope that these theories are all wrong but its dog eat dog out there!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
