Replies to post #216855 on Green Cures and Botanical Distribution Inc (GRCU)

[waterchaser]

So what should CEO Trent Jones do about his false and misleading Bio that states he has a "patent pending"?
I'm sure GRCU wants to be totally honest with its shareholders after the dead attorney and Dick Weed fiascos.

[I-Glow]

LOL!!! I love it you think it is air-tight logic when it isn't close to being factual - but since facts don't fit the agenda of the GRCU shareholders - it only makes sense that you the following is air-tight logic.

Sounds like this is quickly becoming a moot point..

You can't patent a process that occurs naturally in nature.

Well that means no one else can either so since he (CEO TRENT JONES)knows the process and seems to be way ahead of others in this sector as far as knowledge in the sustainable method of Aquaponics this may be something.

I am going to assume you haven't read the final rejection document - if you had you would have seen most of the patent application was unpatentable because IT HAS ALREADY BEEN PATENTED!!! LMAO!

For your dining pleasure I present real FACTS!

Claims 1,3 and 6-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over US Patent Number 5,046,451 to Inslee in view of US Patent Application Number 2006/0163131 by Kieselbach, in further view of the article "Natural abundance of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in Cannabis sativa reflects growth conditions" by Denton...

Claim 4 is rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over US Patent Number 5,046,451 to Inslee

Claim 5 is rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over US Patent Number 5,046,451 to Inslee

So there isn't much left of the patent as Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20!!!!

Jones obviously didn't know what he was doing when he applied for the patent - he can amend it 10 times he will still never be granted a patent because most has already been patented.

IG