Replies to post #55084 on International Consolidated Companies Inc (INCC)

[AXE_EVERYTHING]

new subsidiary's are created all the time for many purposes - their DAYS OLD has nothing to do with anything - INTELLIGENT INVESTORS (not SMART ones) know and understand the reasoning behind structuring a SUBSIDIARY

but for people with less business acumen, they may not fully understand:

The parent-subsidiary structure isolates risks because the two companies are separate legal entities. The losses at a subsidiary do not automatically transfer to the parent company. The parent can exercise control over a subsidiary if it owns a large block of its stock, but not necessarily a majority of the shares. Even a fractional ownership of the shares of a widely held company could result in effective control. The parent-subsidiary operating structure allows for greater diversification and increased efficiencies, partly because senior management at the parent company does not have to be involved in the operational details of its subsidiary . . . .

this is only a few reasons there are many more . . .

this is too sniffy to be true……….although this late afternoon news will get a .0035 out of this,,,,FOR A WEEK……

currently there is DEFINITELY MORE GOING ON HERE THEN JUST SNIFFY TO BE TRUE . . . INTELLIGENT INVESTORS see there is MUCH MORE VERIFIABLE PROOF THEN JUST "SNIFFY"

as the following 8-k SHOWS a VERIFIABLE LEASE - which securing possession of PROPERTY is part of the PROCESS to get a LICENSE, here is the PROOF of lease REPORTED to the SEC already:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10418284

also here is PART 3 of the COLORADO STATE LICENSE - here you can see the checklist of things that they will need to get in order and they have already started - because the LEASE above is one of those items:



in addition to this VERIFIABLE LEASE - we also have this VERIFIABLE SURVEY:


in connection with the SURVEY - we also have the website of the CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYORS that did the SURVEY, here it is: http://www.southerncoloradosurveys.com/index.html

in addition to these VERIFIED things we also have a VERIFIED ARTICLES of INCORPORATION of Edens:


In addition we have VERIFIED GOOD STANDING for Edens:


In addition we have VERIFIED ARTICLES for LaVita:


In addition we have VERIFIED Good Standing for LaVita:

Uccello has answered no HARDBALL questions..he has been emailed several times by SMART investors, NEVER did an answer pop up in a PR or TWEET to all………..

INTELLIGENT INVESTORS (not SMART INVESTORS) understand that business is not done overnight - also INTELLIGENT BUSINESS PEOPLE understand that not ALL DEALS are always going to work PERFECTLY every time - the past deals that were being arranged and negotiated that seemed to have promise at one time have obviously not been fulfilled in a manner that some would have like them to have been fulfilled - but that does not mean that those past dealing are completely dead and out of play - INTELLIGENT BUSINESS PEOPLE KNOW - that NO DEAL is ever COMPLETELY DEAD

looking at the MEHOS permit , we can see that this permit is still in play until AUGUST OF 2016 - so INCC can always capitalize on this opportunity at a later date if this is ON HOLD right now



in addition, this paragraph of todays PR very much explains to me what INTELLIGENT INVESTORS understand:
Navigating the Colorado real estate market for the cannabis business can be a treacherous endeavor, requiring property with 1) the correct zoning 2) friendly local government 3) a landlord willing to allow cannabis in his building 4) no mortgage on the property which may be called by a federally insured bank 5) enough property to grow your business from tier one (3,600 plants), to tier two (6.000 plants), to tier three (10,200 plants), accommodating three 10,000 square foot buildings. MCHI has crossed these significant hurdles and is on its way to create significant revenue.



in addition, a VERY INTERESTING 8-k was filed by FWDG , looking at this 8-k , I am very curious to know what this deal entails - and I have a feeling that we can be in store for something that is much larger then our previous growtech solution - the 8-k that I am referencing is at this link:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10445443

my predictions for the PPS have been closer than 95% here

I have no idea if that is true or not - but what I do know

is that PAST PERFORMANCE is not an indicator of FUTURE RESULTS in the investment world - so please dont guarantee to investors that you are 95% percent right - people should be making their own decisions and their own DD and deciding from there