Abe, it's NOT my opinion; these are the studies out there
You can't just say, "Hey, that's your opinion, fine, but I've got mine."
I'm not giving any opinion. I'm just citing the literature. And all the science is there to support the hiding of phosphatidylserine externalization.
THAT IS NOT MY OPINION. That is the result of SCIENTIFIC studies outside of PPHM, and outside of UTSW.
As for your stock price of $1.28, that is a question of the commercialization of the science, not an indictment of the science itself.
You know Biotech, Abe. You know how quirky it is. You know that Wall Street has a Jerry Maguire fixation: "SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!"
I/O is indeed an emerging field. And Wall Street is still trying to get its head around it.
$1.28, $1.38, $1.58....
The question I have for you is this:
If PPHM were $1.68 right now, would you have more confidence in the science?
Do you see how absurd that is? You are basing your confidence in the science on the vagaries of the market.
Please read more.
Hit PubMed and start searching. Might I suggest "MDSC" "antitumor immunity" "phosphatidylserine" and "M1 polarization" as search terms to start.
Regards,
Joe
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
