InvestorsHub Logo

ThSeeker

01/31/15 8:25 AM

#112770 RE: Rhinegold #112769

$.90 that alone shows how flawed the interpretation of the DD is.

Nothing at all to support that. Last time we saw those levels
was 2007 BEFORE Billions of shares dilution.

You have no confirmable DD showing big revs. I highly suspect
that what you found is probably associating some company's revs that is not RCCH's. Just like the RCC Consultants was thought to be RCCH's but is not.

DD that takes it conclusion for the like --- Company A has Joe Smo associated with it and company B has Joe Smo associated with it therefore Company A owns Company B. We are rich does not cut it.

N.A.T.

01/31/15 10:26 AM

#112776 RE: Rhinegold #112769

I'm a former believer. I sincerely want you to be right, because my shares could then be worth something. Today, they are worthless. The extra zero has never bothered me, I know what it means, and understand its significance.

I also understand exactly why Seeker, Dom, and others disagree with your projections as to $.90+ pps in RCCH's future. There has never been a successful short squeeze from 0.0001 to anything like those figures. You are calling for something no one has ever seen to happen.

While I have at least temporarily stepped back from posting my negative beliefs while awaiting Gene's "return", based on some of the material found by you and Kramer and Jimthorpe, I can not go so far as to say I am convinced by any of it. Common sense still says Gene has done, and will do nothing to get us out of this mess. If we are still waiting June 1, even you should start admitting you were wrong. Please be right.