InvestorsHub Logo

dr_lowenstein

01/30/15 7:48 PM

#142747 RE: John_Langston #142746

the answer is nothing and as I pointed out, there were so many inaccuracies and leaps of logic that the article has been thoroughly discredited.

barttrab11

01/30/15 7:58 PM

#142750 RE: John_Langston #142746

Nothing has fundamental changed since .21, but then again fundamentals have only gotten better since .97.

elichen

01/30/15 8:11 PM

#142753 RE: John_Langston #142746

The more relevant question is: what has changed fundamentally since the pps was .97???

Answer: Among other things--more drugs launched, more patents on our intellectual property, more quarters with increased revenue, more successful BE and other trials, meeting(s) with the FDA, much closer to filing and then launching the first of many ARTs.

Luke_

01/30/15 8:41 PM

#142756 RE: John_Langston #142746

I completely agree with you. There, maybe this won't get deleted. Apparently one is not allowed to disagree with your opinions or ask questions as to why you post what you post. Maybe somebody can explain the rules here. Are we not allowed to ingage each other in conversation?

mrwrn2010

01/31/15 1:26 AM

#142771 RE: John_Langston #142746

Nothing. But we've improved our fundamentals even more than when we traded at .97, so think about that.