Well, how about all the DD garronsc did, in digging up the news items about the truck deal in Niger? I may be wrong, but I think a couple of board members here have asked Marty about the relevance of that information to AMMX involvement. But, no definitive statement one way or another from Marty.
Does that not concern you? Would that not be some definitive proof of AMMX and their involvement in the truck deal. Why no response to those requests?
I find it kind of disturbing that the last couple of Updates have "warned" share holders not to depend on the Niger deal as a basis for investment. And that we should consider more heavily, the core business of AMMX.
Rather than keep rehashing and arguing semantics, why not let others base their opinions on the same level of proof that you have? Which is?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
