Replies to post #34699 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[BigE1960]

"Effect to cost is minimal," said Simon Sung, vice president of Samsung's visual display business

[quarrydawg]

they're making nanosys dots in house.

http://www.nanosysinc.com/in-the-news/

[wynns01]

I imagine they are using Nanosys' patents based on their licensing agreement. Nanosys must be able to produce both Cd-based dots and NHM dots. If this is true it looks like further trouble for Nanoco as their big claim to fame was the production of NHM dots.

[DDhawk]

Not quite "just like that"...Samsung has been building-up to this for quite awhile now. This will give you some idea of their own internal supply chain capabilities: http://global.ofweek.com/news/Samsung-and-LG-take-lead-in-the-QD-TV-market-24355 Per patent records; Samsung has at least 4 spin-off divisions that not only do their own research, but supply & manufacture as well & have generated at least 26 key QDot patents of their own. They also licensed QD patents from Nanosys & Evident, like these: http://www.digitalsignagenews.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=196:samsung-in-quantum-dot-led-patent-agreement&catid=40:display-and-projection&Itemid=70 and http://www.nanosysinc.com/in-the-news/2015/1/9/compound-semi-nanosys-announces-patent-deal-with-samsung I have no idea if they can truly (by definition) "mass-produce" QDots...but Asians cultures are known to have built mountains, one basket full of dirt at a time, for centuries...we'll see.