Replies to post #31665 on Electronic Cigarettes International Group Ltd fka

[Full Contact Yoga]

I missed it too...looks like doing nothing is a "no" to both proposals.

[stayfocused]

I certainly would read it that way, but 'indicated' seems a strange choice of word, maybe I'm reading too much into it!

[Penny_Madness]

We must be absolutely sure if neglecting to vote will count as a "NO" I am going to vote "NO" anyway just to make sure.

[stayfocused]

There's also this which I take to mean that you can only vote personally if the certs are in your name and not through a broker. I'm getting confused now, lol.


"If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes.” Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. Brokers that have not received voting instructions from their clients cannot vote on their clients’ behalf on “non-routine” proposals. Broker non-votes are not counted for the purposes of obtaining a quorum for the Special Meeting, and, in tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote.

[power_forward]

lol like it matters--R/S is inevitable