InvestorsHub Logo

Huggy Bear

01/28/15 9:15 PM

#26061 RE: Cassandra #26059

The whole venture is an abuse of the Section 3(a)(10) exemption from registration and likely massive fraud with false and misleading press releases to pump the stock so that the newly-issued free-trading shares can be dumped. I would not be surprised to see SEC action in this matter.



This is what I call a Section 3(a)(10) exemption hijacking, as the exemption as written into law by Congress was intended to relieve "bona fide" debt obligations.

I cannot fathom how any forward-looking operations can be considered bona fide debt owed, although I have recently seen this maneuver attempted by another company we are both familiar with.

In this instance even private individuals are the recipients of shares that are not restricted from directly free trading in any fashion.

For what is my question?

The shoddy language in the Section 3(a)(10) exemption has me doing the Linda Blair dance move in double time.

I cannot fathom in any fashion how any of this constitutes bona fide debt owed to anyone.

https://app.box.com/s/833u9k6u6n81p8ejzc83t11vcp02kx3x

https://app.box.com/s/3zjz7smtranwias5lhrlvurhnpf3d6nf

Huggy Bear

01/28/15 9:32 PM

#26066 RE: Cassandra #26059

I am familiar with that action you linked. However, this takes it to an entirely new level.

truthbetold1

01/28/15 10:02 PM

#26073 RE: Cassandra #26059

Thanks for the info. I'm buying more in the morn.

cyberbullymouse

01/28/15 10:08 PM

#26074 RE: Cassandra #26059

Unbelievable that anyone can support an obvious fraudulent endeavor.

It's so incredibly brazen that it's laughable.

carlson

01/29/15 10:18 AM

#26237 RE: Cassandra #26059

The only thing that is crooked is the dog leg on the chart at .0012. And now WE are at .0022. Hoping to move up big.

Chief Slapaho

01/29/15 11:42 AM

#26298 RE: Cassandra #26059

Looks like a VERY competent attorney to me. Has great background and experience. I'd hire this guy too.

Mr. Goulding passed the bar examination and became an attorney in 1978 receiving his J.D. from DePaul Law School. He passed the certified public accountant examination in 1971. Mr. Goulding spent six years with the Internal Revenue Service Audit and Intelligence Divisions, before opening a private tax law practice, focusing on income and estate taxation and planning, securities and litigation. His litigation experience included practice before the United States Supreme Court, Illinois Supreme Court, State Court, Federal District Court, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Tax Court. More recently, however, Mr. Goulding’s practice has focused more on SEC and investment related matters.

Mr. Goulding is a former Internal Revenue Service agent and Intelligence Division Special Agent. He received special commendations for his efforts, saving the Internal Revenue Service substantial sums for his design of new internal audit and accounting procedures and controls for the Intelligence Division’s Special Operations. His Internal Revenue Service functions also included television and radio appearances. Crain’s Chicago Business Magazine featured an article on the “Goulding Report” reflecting consequences of investments in solar and other renewable energy sources. Mr. Goulding received a business administration degree with a dual major in accounting and finance from the University of Illinois.

Since 2004, Mr. Goulding served in multiple capacities as an architect of equity investments with Chicago-area investment and financial consulting organizations.His specialty has been negotiating and structuring PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equities) transactions for investment companies and private investors.

Mr. Goulding is very involved with charitable endeavors. In October 2003, he was voted “Humanitarian of the Millennium” by One Church One Family. Other notable recipients of the award included Joseph Cardinal Bernadine, Federal Judge Abraham Lincoln Marowitz, Jesse White and President Barack Obama. Mr. Goulding is a personal friend of Father George Clements of the Chicago Diocese, and is a substantial contributor to, One Church One Family. He has also played a key role in bringing these and other charitable endeavors to the US Virgin Islands.

elkonig

01/29/15 1:11 PM

#26349 RE: Cassandra #26059

Randall Goulding did the same share scam suit thing over at Xformity now OTC: GDSR. The next thing you know they deregistered from the SEC and did a reverse split.

stervc

02/02/15 11:34 AM

#27142 RE: Cassandra #26059

Cassandra, to better understand your thoughts…

Randy Goulding is the lawyer that is currently in Good Standing” that put the deal together for IJJP and the consortium of companies. If you research that case a little further, you will see that ”The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (the “NACDL”) and ”The Illinois Attorneys for Criminal Justice” each filed an ”Amicus Curiae” brief in support of Randy’s appeal concluding that Randy committed no fraud and made no misrepresentations.

I learned this because I called Randy to speak with him on the matter. I asked if he had anything in writing that he could send me to help others within an investing forum that was getting the wrong impression about him and he sent me two documents; a copy of the Amicus Curiae that was filed on his behalf and a letter of explanation that he had previously sent to others to outline what ”actually” transpired. He stated that those documents will indicate how his conduct was not inappropriate as concluded by very credible parties. He stated that this information will be provided in links on the website that is in the process of completing updates after I reached out to speak with Randy from his contact number on his website below:
http://gouldinglaw.com/Contact_Us.html

I’ll show the two documents that he sent me at the end of this post, but here is what The NACDL specifically concluded:


“This approach to criminal liability effectively outlaws apparently innocent conduct of lawyers in protecting client confidentiality.”

“An attorney’s duty of confidentiality to the client requires that legal services be performed in a manner which prevents incriminating disclosures, where there is no ongoing criminal activity. Compliance with that duty cannot “defraud” the IRS.”

“The Seventh Circuit Has Taken the Fraud out of the Defraud Clause. Its Standard Jury
Instructions Fail to Require Any “Purposeful Misrepresentation” or “Dishonesty” for an 18
U.S.C. § 371 Conviction. Such a Broad and Distorted Use of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 1341 Denies Due Process.”

“The Seventh Circuit’s jury instructions for 18 U.S.C. § 371, criminalizing apparently innocent conduct by not requiring [a wrongful intent, is in] conflict with eight other circuits.”

“The induced conduct lacks knowing participation in a criminal conspiracy—defendants [which also includes the attorney I engaged to assure compliance with the law] consistently encouraged [the undercover agent to comply] with the law.”

“The government’s crime fraud theory is flawed—the client proposed no future crime or fraud; there was no misrepresentation or any other element of fraud—the ethical prescriptions of the legal profession require that lawyers perform services in a manner which preserves such client confidences.”

“Standard Seventh Circuit instructions defining “willfulness” as “avoidance” improperly facilitate conviction for apparently innocent avoidance conduct.”

“This prosecution has the appearance of retaliation for Goulding’s exercise of first amendment and other statutory rights.”


Since that time, Randy has regained his license and have practiced law without incident.

Regardless of his past, he is a registered Attorney that is authorized to ”currently” practice law. He is a Licensed Securities Attorney authorized to practice law under his Attorney No. 1025619. Here are Randy’s credentials below:
http://gouldinglaw.com/About_Us.html

As for the issue that insinuated to be a problem with the SEC, within the link you provided below, it specifically stated that the problem that got that other unrelated situation in trouble with the SEC was as follow… ”The Complaint alleges that the Section 3(a)(10) exemption was not available for any of the stock offerings at issue because the terms and conditions of the exchanges – including the fact that the issuers were raising capital through such exchanges – were not fully disclosed to the court.” This is per the link you provided below:
http://www.lawupdates.com/summary/civil_injunctive_action_filed_against_penny_stock_financiers_and_two_public/

As you can see from the links that you provided within the posts below as proof, the lawyer here, Randall S. Goulding (Randy), had provided, made available, and fully disclosed to the court the Section 3(a)(10) exemption for all stock offerings at issue while also fully disclosing the terms and conditions of the exchanges:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=110290324
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=110310112

Here are the main documents disclosed to the court:
http://www.cannabisheadliners.com/images/PDF/4_disclosure_memorandum.pdf

This means that... the reasons that you are believing will be an issue with the SEC based on a different situation that failed… do not exist here.

Here’s the bottom line for how everything is related. The judge approved an Income Sharing Program between IJJP and five other companies (HALB, CWIR, TWDL, ENTI, & GEAR) of which the Income will come from two marijuana operations/farms; World of Marihuana Productions Ltd. (WOM) and Michigan Plant Technologies (MPT). The Income distribution per the court order is indicated below:



Randall S. Goulding Background Letter Regarding Federal Government Issue

Page 1


Page 2


Page 3


Page 4




Amicus Curiae for Randall S. Goulding

Page 1


Page 2


Page 3


Page 4


Page 5


Page 6


Page 7


Page 8


Page 9


Page 10


Page 11


Page 12


Page 13


Page 14


Page 15


v/r
Sterling