InvestorsHub Logo

236T568

01/27/15 4:35 PM

#19340 RE: newelong #19338

huh?

a less than $1.0 million valuation in stock for the Ember acquisition pretty much underscores how little successful Ember was





but it had to be successful in and of itself, because when Mr. Shareef acquired Ember it came with some very notable clients

236T568

01/27/15 4:38 PM

#19341 RE: newelong #19338

Sorry, but when you say "Traffic MarketPlace" are you referring to this sleazy operation?



http://www.adotas.com/2011/06/quick-hits-traffic-marketplace-is-now-epic-marketplace/

http://performinsider.com/2012/06/how-epic-media-group-fucked-affiliates/

http://www.exterminatelab.com/remove-trafficmarketplace-virus





And anyone who pooh-poohs the fact that many of his recruits at one time worked at Traffic Marketplace knows nothing about the valuable experience they gained there which subsequently lead to prominent positions in many different and well-respected ad tech companies. I doubt that any of them would have left those positions if Mr. Shareef hadn't convinced them of the potential at Adaptive, and apparently they had no issues working for him.


236T568

01/27/15 4:43 PM

#19342 RE: newelong #19338

ahh, come on now

ADTM/MIMI has been claiming "cash flow positive by the end of year" for 5 years now

the 4th quarter of 2014 is going to come out as the worse quarter in years for cash flow once scam company ADTM reports the figures



and don't dismiss the author's remark about ADTM possibly becoming cash flow positive by the end of the year. Compare that to other companies that have been in business much longer than Adaptive which fairly recently went public, yet are still nowhere near profitability. No one seems to want to acknowledge what an accomplishment that would be.

Irish62

01/29/15 2:30 PM

#19378 RE: newelong #19338

newelong,

.....I am glad you responded. You have indeed contributed to this board in the way of information, and yes research, more than all of us other posters combined.

I think on a personal note we only disagreed concerning Shareef and specifically my seeing him as for a lying POS scumbag, and you viewing him as a very ethical man who through his accomplishments---and he did accomplish a lot---somehow made him out to what I solely termed you seeing him as a "saint". You even got to the point in one message where you referred to him as Qayad because you felt that with all the research you did on the company and Shareef that you not only knew about the company you invested in but also that you knew what you invested in as far as the CEO was concerned.

You started attacking me "between-the-lines" in solo posts and in posts by others that you responded to because I started questioning the ethics and motives of Shareef. The man was a liar and quickly turned away from everything he said he cared about when it came to shareholders---transparency and shareholder value. The man started recklessly issuing shares as if he was throwing darts at ideas and also to create his back pocket majority .....and that pissed me off because I own more shares than some on that list. Other than that I appreciated the massive amount of research and knowledge you provided this board with and I highly doubt I am the only one that feels that way. You are a GOOD MAN!


Newelong I still am in your corner and wish that you would continue to post because you do know a helluva lot about this company and have contributed greatly. Maybe it will take some time for you to remove yourself "personally" from Shareef turning out to be what he is but if not then I sincerely say thank you!

Take care and I hope all is well with you and your family.