Well, STILL waiing for MS. Starkweather to provide an explanation for the THREE different sets of data that apparently were collected from the same group of patients but which were all different.
I can't imagine WHAT might cause the delay -- can you?
In any case, I at least heard back from the "Director, Office of Research Integrity and Ethics, Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation," who assured me:
"Your email was received. Your concerns will be addressed."
I certainly hope so because I also wrote "integrity and ethics" at NIH that I was worried whether the chameleon-like data could represent ethical issues that might also arise in the course of MS. Starkweather spending the over seven MILLION dollars of NIH grant money she's currently got.
What the heck! I think I'll forward a copy to Adam Feuerstein at "thestreet.com" just to see what he thinks about it! Shoot! He might even mention it in one of his articles! Make for a great press release from CTTC, huh?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
