Replies to post #95606 on JNS Holding Corp (JNSH)

[toonces]

Tom Gage is the chairman of EV grid. He is said to be an expert in EV's. He is quoted as saying that Punic charging is rarely used.

1. Who made Tom Gage the expert and why is he commenting on Punic charging? I, myself would not Punic charge, so I guess I can understand why it is rarely used.
2. You do know that JNSH does more than work with EV chargers, right?
3. Fuel Cells are turds. Oops sorry, this wasn't brought up, but just thought I would say it.

[Stock_Barber]

Tom Gage is the chairman of EV grid

It is fine to quote him, but let's keep his comments in context. Tom and EVGrid see the future of automobiles as electric cars... not Fool Cells! This is from EVGrid's homepage:

WHAT WE BELIEVE

Adoption of electric vehicles will rapidly accelerate in the next decades. Oil prices could spike due to growing demand in emerging markets and the increasing costs of extraction and environmental damage. At the same time, the price of electric vehicles will drop from lower battery costs and increased production volume. More and more drivers will enjoy the benefits of driving with clean, comfortable, and convenient electric propulsion.
As the EV fleet grows, it might stress the power grid - but it doesn't have to. Instead, EVs can support the grid and make it more efficient, more responsive, more reliable, and less expensive. The batteries aboard every EV will represent a vast resource of power and energy. Innovative technologies will harness this resource using smart links between EVs, drivers, charging stations, renewable generation, aggregators, and utilities. An electric vehicle grid will unleash electric power so it can meet the needs of the 21st century.

WHY WE EXIST

We believe in a better way. It's why we come to work everyday.

Electric propulsion is a better way and our founders have been in the trenches of electric vehicle commercialization over the past 20 years. Today EVs can be had in a variety of shapes and sizes, advanced batteries give unprecedented range, and a growing infrastructure makes charging convenient and easy.

So when he talks about low current usage of chargers, he is correct. So he certainly must also be correct when he talks about the future being EV's, right?